We’ve spent five weeks looking at the question that continues to be the focus of reports and articles in the media – “Is college worth it?” – from the standpoint of four distinct concerns: its perceived lack of affordability; the burden of debt that faces so many graduates; the relative scarcity of well-paying jobs for recent college graduates; and the risk that a student will borrow money, not complete his or her course of study, and be economically worse off than if he or she had never started. (As an aside, I should note that the question of the worth of a college education has been so frequently asked that it is now being satirized. The Onion recently posted the following headline on its website: “Study Finds College Still More Worthwhile Than Spending 4 Years Chained to Radiator.”)

Before I attempt my own answer to the question, “Is college worth it?” I must express a caveat: The way the question has been posed by the media implies that the only value a college degree has is economic. I hope we will all quickly agree that the benefits of a college education extend far beyond mere monetary return. College graduates, as a rule, are more engaged citizens; they are healthier and far less likely to be incarcerated; they live fuller and more complete lives; they have a deeper understanding of the world in which they are living; they are more tolerant and compassionate. These are generalizations, of course, not universally true for every college graduate – but they are most assuredly accurate at the group level.

Moreover, many people who attend college do so in order to have a career in a field they find meaningful and enjoyable, as opposed to accepting a job only because it will pay well. “Show me the money” is not a fair summation of the value of a college education.

All that said, it is still reasonable to ask whether, from a strictly economic perspective, attending college is a sound investment.

As I pointed out in last week’s blog, a recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“Do the Benefits of College Still Outweigh the Costs?”) found that “workers with a bachelor’s degree on average earn well over $1 million more than high school graduates during their working lives.” The report also points out that the differential between the lifetime earnings of college graduates relative to high school graduates has never been greater.

Those statistics would seem to provide an unequivocal answer. Clearly, college is “worth it.” Why, then, does this question keep being asked?

I think there are four answers, three of which we have considered (at least in part) in previous blog posts in this series:

1. The investment for a college degree seems daunting.

   As I showed in my post of July 28 (and as David Leonhardt noted in his column in The New York Times the next day – July 29), using a college’s list price for tuition greatly overstates the actual cost to the student – particularly in the case of private colleges. Leonhardt notes that, over the past 20 years, inflation-adjusted net tuition and fees have increased by 60 percent at public universities (primarily because of the enormous decline in state financial support), but by only 22 percent at private institutions. (In fact, over the past seven years, net cost at most private institutions has actually fallen.) But the public perception, based as it is on list prices, is that colleges have become prohibitively expensive.

   Even though the actual price paid by the average student has not risen appreciably faster than the price of many other staples (gasoline, for example, is up more than 80 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars over the past two decades), the costs of attending college obviously represent a very large investment for most families – and with more students and families now relying on loans to pay for their college costs, their concern about the amount of their debt at graduation is certainly understandable.

   Finally, there is the worry that some graduates may not be able to find a well-paying job, and therefore not be able to afford to discharge their student loan debt. As we saw in Part 4 of this blog series, fears of underemployment are overstated, but nevertheless remain real, especially for graduates in many of the liberal arts, who may struggle to establish a career path.

   Taken together, these concerns understandably give pause to many families whose children are making a decision whether or not to attend college—and if so, how much they can afford to pay.

2. My son or daughter may drop out and be in debt.

   As we saw in Part 5 of this series, the most valid concern regarding the value of investing in a college degree is the fear that the student might not graduate. Many factors contribute, positively or negatively, to the likelihood of completion: the student’s intelligence, ambition, maturity and level of academic preparation; the relative quality of the college or university; stresses within the family, especially financial; whether or not the student is the first in his or her family to attend college; the socioeconomic status of the family. Students and families must be realistic in evaluating these factors as they make a decision regarding college.

3. The payoff is uncertain because it is uneven.

   There is no question that the average college graduate earns substantially more than the average high school graduate. However, talking about average income obscures the significance of the range of income earned by college graduates as a group.

   To illustrate, a recent study (Urban Institute, “Higher Education Earnings Premium: Value, Variation, and Trends,” February 2014) found that, in 2012, the median income of college graduates aged 35 to 44 was $61,255, as compared to a median income of high school graduates of $35,703 – but one in six college graduates in that age group actually earned less than $35,703. In other words, there is overlap of the income ranges of all college graduates and all high school graduates, such that almost 20 percent of college graduates actually earn less than the median salary of a high school graduate. So one way of looking at this issue is to say that more than four out of five college graduates will earn a premium – often, a very substantial premium – for being a college graduate – but a college degree does not guarantee that all college graduates will earn more than those without the degree.

   As we saw in Part 4 of this series, one important factor in contributing to this salary overlap between college graduates and high school graduates is the fact that the economic value of different majors varies enormously, especially in terms of the salaries earned by the most recent graduates.

   There are also significant regional differences in income. In 2011, college graduates 25 and older had a median income of $71,000 in New Jersey and Connecticut, whereas those in Michigan had a median income of just $44,000 (and the median across the nation as a whole was $58,000). Comparing the salary of a college graduate in one state with the earnings of a high school graduate in another could certainly give rise to a misinterpretation about the economic value of a college degree.

4. The economic payoff for having a college degree may not be large enough.

   The size of the payoff is a factor that underlies much of the concern that people feel about the economic benefit of attending college, and it’s a factor that we have not yet considered in this blog series. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York report I referenced earlier that showed college graduates earning, on average, over $1 million more in lifetime earnings than the average worker with just a high school diploma – an income differential that has never been greater. How, then, can anyone question the economic value of the payoff?

   The primary reason there is such a large differential between the earnings of college graduates and those with just a high school diploma is not only because the salaries of college graduates have risen, but also because the salaries of high school graduates have fallen. Over the last decade, the average hourly wage for college graduates is up just one percent, whereas the average wage for high school graduates has dropped by five percent (The New York Times, “Is College Worth It? Clearly, New Data Say,” May 27, 2014).

   These trends are not limited just to the past 10 years. Indeed, between 1980 and 2012, high school graduates saw an income drop of 11 percent, whereas college graduates experienced an income increase of 20 percent – or 56 percent for those who went to graduate school (Bloomberg View, “Is a College Education Worth a Skinned Eel?” May 29, 2014).

   At the same time, the percentage of jobs that are part-time, rather than full-time, has risen from 16.5 percent before the 2008 recession to 18.8 percent today – and almost 37 percent of home mortgage holders are “effectively underwater” – either the mortgage exceeds the actual value of the house, or the sale of the house would not cover closing costs and a down payment on a new home (Associated Press, “Not All Feeling Gains of Better Job Market,” Aug. 3, 2014). These factors inevitably contribute to the general concern that the economy is still not doing well, and the fear by some parents that now might not be the best time to invest large sums of money sending their child to college.

   Finally, the nature of the job market continues to change rapidly, due to technology and globalization. Occupations such as word processors, telephone operators and travel agents have declined by 75 percent since 2000, whereas the number of computer software engineers, physical therapists, nurses and financial advisors have increased by as much as 160 percent over that same time period (The New York Times, “Fear Not the Coming of the Robots,” June 22, 2014). Of course, the good news is that all those growth occupations require a college degree, whereas most of the occupations in decline do not – but these sudden changes in the growth and decline of specific job categories may be unsettling to families contemplating a major investment in their child’s college education.

To summarize, while it is easy to understand a family’s trepidation as they contemplate spending for their child’s academic future, a college education is demonstrably a sound financial investment – but with three caveats:

1. Be aware of the differences in economic value of different majors. The choice of college major is closely linked to the starting salary of the graduate, and to the extent that students and families are seeking an immediate payoff for spending a good deal of money on a college education, a major in a professional program generally provides a higher economic return in the short run than a major in the liberal arts. (As I have noted in a previous blog post, this difference is typically eliminated by age 40.)
2. Do not over-borrow. Students should not borrow more than they expect to earn in their first year of employment: roughly $30,000 for many of the liberal arts graduates, and up to $60,000 for certain of the professions. Use subsidized government loans, and avoid private loans, whenever possible.
3. Commit to actually graduating. Most important, the student must graduate. There is no economic payoff for leaving a college without a diploma – and there are serious negative consequences to leaving without a diploma and in debt.

A college degree does not automatically ensure a prosperous and satisfying life – but it is most assuredly the single best step a young person can take in planning for his or her future.

Last Friday, the latest edition of TIME Magazine hit newsstands across America with a cover that would have been inconceivable just a few years ago – one blurb previewing the “Reinventing College” issue proclaimed, “Our Exclusive Poll: 80% Think College Isn’t Worth the Money.”

Newsweek – before last week’s news on the move to all-digital – actually beat TIME to the punch, asking on its September 17 issue, “Is College a Lousy Investment?”

The Economist called out higher education a few weeks earlier: “Four-year residential colleges cannot keep on forever raising their fees faster than the public’s capacity to pay for them… Universities that fail to prepare for the hurricane ahead are likely to be flattened by it.”

Wow! Ten years ago, it would have been unthinkable for a national news magazine to question the worth of a college degree. To be sure, even then there was concern about the rising cost of college, but we weren’t seeing predictions of widespread institutional collapse, or references to “the hurricane ahead.” Is this real, or is this just journalists selling newspapers?

Having spent much of my time studying the topic over the past six months, I am forced to conclude that it is real – and that poses a genuine threat to higher education. Universities take justifiable pride in their collective longevity and stability, evolving as times change, but doing so at the glacial pace that characterizes how higher education does its business. When we are confronted by some external threat, our natural inclination is to go into hibernation while we wait for this latest storm to pass.

This time, I believe it’s different. Too many forces are arrayed against us. For higher education to serve its very critical place in American society, our educational model must be reinvented, as TIME and so many others suggest – we need to maintain (ideally, increase) our quality while simultaneously making it more affordable, and therefore more accessible, for more Americans. A failure to do so will almost certainly lead to our nation’s economic decline.

Central to everything are cost and student debt. The increasing economic stratification of American society has led to a situation where there are a small number of prospective students who can afford to go to any university that will accept them, and a growing number who are in danger of not being able to afford to go anywhere. It is not simply that the cost of higher education has been increasing at a substantially higher rate than the cost of living – it is also that the median family income, in inflation-adjusted dollars, has been falling.

Value, of course, is the flip side of the cost and debt equation – and increasingly, the value of a university education is being seen as synonymous with the ability to obtain a relevant, well-paying job. Students, parents, employers – not to mention politicians – are now expecting that graduates will be able to do something of immediate use and value to their employers.

Yet is it regrettably the case that, since the recession of 2008-09 and continuing to the present, many college graduates are having a difficult time finding employment. Even when they do, they are often overqualified and undercompensated, leading to problems in repaying debt.

Even if every new study points to the unquestionable long-term value of a college degree – and even in the current economy, better short-term job prospects than those without bachelor’s degrees – employment snapshots taken in the months following graduation do not help to point these facts out.

So what does all this mean for Roger Williams University? Is any single institution really capable of taking on such sweeping issues and offering genuine solutions without compromising its own institutional health?

Perhaps not overnight, but in the absence of a significant economic rebound for the country and given the deep and abiding concerns of the public relating to cost, debt and job preparedness, I believe we have an obligation to tackle these issues head-on, in a dramatic and wide-ranging manner.

In an address to the University’s faculty and staff this afternoon, I shared details on Affordable Excellence at Roger Williams University – a comprehensive strategy that puts us on the right track in responding to the concerns noted above.

Through the Affordable Excellence initiative, we will expand upon the value of our academic experience by encouraging all students to major and minor in a combination of liberal arts and professional programs; and we’ll ensure that all graduates, irrespective of major, emerge with at least one meaningful example of experiential, project-based learning. We’ll focus on evolving our value proposition in the months ahead, integrating a fuller range of faculty/student interactions, immersing students in cross-disciplinary projects and ensuring that our students are exceptionally well prepared to graduate job- or graduate school-ready.

Simultaneously, we have announced a tuition freeze for the 2013-14 academic year for all undergraduate day students – next year’s enrolled students will pay the same as this year’s – and a tuition guarantee, which ensures that tuition for all those currently enrolled, and those who arrive next fall, will be guaranteed not to increase for four years for all students who remain continuously enrolled.

And perhaps most importantly, we hope to start an even broader conversation – both on campus and in the public realm – on access to and affordability of college, with a specific emphasis on higher education’s approach to tuition rates, pricing structures and financial aid.

Today’s announcement on Affordable Excellence – and this introductory President’s Blog post – are simply the earliest stages of a dialogue I know will be critical to Roger Williams University and to higher education as a whole. We will explore these issues in depth via this blog and other media in the coming months, and I very much invite your input in the conversation.

America has stated very clearly that it requires higher education to be both better and more affordable. While our natural inclination may be point to our centuries of collective success and wait out the storm, doing so will only prolong the inevitable – we need sustainable solutions, and we need them quickly.

Roger Williams University cannot single-handedly rectify the challenges facing the entire higher education enterprise. But we can do the right thing by our own students and their families by controlling our costs, limiting debt, and ensuring that our graduates have the skills necessary not only to obtain a well-paying job in a bleak economy, but to lead a successful and fulfilling life.